Marvel Agents of SHIELD: Mediocrity Isn’t A Superpower

A picture from the unreleased Roger Corman "Fantastic Four" film.

It’s not like Marvel hasn’t had some ordinary films made with its characters, but I’m sure they didn’t want Agents of SHIELD to be a step back towards that era. (Image sourced from: Third Millenium)

To put it kindly, Marvel Agents of SHIELD (‘AoS’) is mediocre. Despite the source material (the multi-billion dollar Marvel Studios film franchise), the talent (geek favourite Joss Whedon’s name was everywhere prior to the show launching) and the potential industry muscle (Disney, Marvel and ABC) AoS just doesn’t deliver across its first five episodes.

At best it has been watchable; at worst it has been hilariously b- and even c-grade. I can watch bad shows with great amusement, but AoS isn’t even consistently so-bad-it’s-good. It’s just flat. The typical reasons I’ve seen listed on the internet for this underperformance has been that the scripts are dull (true) and the acting wooden (often true) but that’s not the full set of reasons.

From here on out, there may be ***SPOILERS***, so read ahead with that in mind.

Aiming Low And Still Missing

When I think about the Marvel Studios films, there are four key ingredients that made them successful:

  1. Selection of the right talent both on- and off-screen. The Iron Man franchise relied heavily on the charm of Robert Downey Jr to make a jerk character likeable and the directing talent of Jon Favereau (for two films) to keep a thin-ish narrative moving forward. Even the emptiest of Marvel’s films – I’ll go with “Thor” for this particular accolade – was well cast and directed.
  2. Not skimping on the action budget. The Marvel films have had good CGI and action scenes. The success of “Avengers” was built on this.
  3. Property destruction. Superhero films of the past have often suffered because destroying things is expensive, so the superheroes with massively destructive powers carefully avoided damaging anything costly. This has changed with the recent Marvel films where lots of things – up to and including New York City – get blown up good.
  4. Leveraging the Marvel universe. The Marvel films have been a kind of selected remix of elements of the standard 616 universe, the Ultimates universe and a good smattering of material the writers just wanted to add.

AoS has very little of the above. I wasn’t expecting AoS to be Marvel movie grade, but even with reduced expectations AoS falls well short of delivering.

The Problem With Coulson

 A picture of Agent Coulson with glasses on.

Coulson is your friendly neighbourhood government agent. His superpower is being interchangable with other faceless government agents. (Image sourced from: Damn, That’s Some Fine Tailoring)

A key link between Agents and the Marvel films is the presence of Agent Coulson, played by Clark Gregg. This is a problem, because Agent Coulson’s role in the Marvel films has been as a bland everyman agent that superpowered beings are automatically better than.

He’s been a Man in Black (-ish) representing a shadowy government organisation that’s out of its depth. In “Iron Man” Coulson is the man who can’t organise an appointment with Tony Stark and sees part of his team getting killed by Obadiah Stane in the Iron Monger suit. “Thor” sees Coulson grab all of Jane Foster / Erik Selvig’s research and lock it up, only to return the research when it looks like it will keep Thor onside. “Sorry ma’am, we’re the good guys,” Coulson says, rather unconvincingly, when stripping Foster of her life’s work.

Coulson’s greatest contribution to the Marvel films was in “Avengers”, where he died and was used as an inspiration to get the other Avengers together (because an invading alien army headed up by a supervillain wasn’t enough)… which AoS immediately undid in the first episode by bringing Coulson back to life.

Coulson doesn’t have enough substance to be the head of the team. He’s a tertiary character in the films, on the level of Iron Man’s Happy Hogan or one of Thor’s Warrior Three: there, but not a key part of the narrative and easily replacable. His mystery resurrection isn’t that interesting because this is a comic book universe, where rising from the dead is pretty much a normal Tuesday. Whether or not Coulson is a Life Model Decoy or a clone or something else isn’t interesting enough to sustain the mystery since there’s no depth to it – Coulson lacks enough charisma to make the audience interested in him as a character.

This is a shame, because Clark Gregg can bring a great everyman charisma to his roles – it was probably the attribute that helped get him the role in the first place. Give Gregg someone to bounce great lines off and he can shine, as seen in his one-shot short movies like The Consultant:

Unfortunately, Gregg doesn’t have the quality of dialogue he needs, or other actors with the ability to spark up a great conversation with, in AoS.

Team (Don’t) Work

The rest of the characters in AoS have their own issues. Ming-Na Wen is Melinda May aka The Cavalry, an inscrutable Asian who is a master of martial arts and super-capable at lots of other things, like piloting The Bus (the huge aircraft that serves as AoS’ base) single-handed. May is a Serious Character who is Serious, so thus far hasn’t been a great character for Coulson to bounce one liners off.

The Agents of SHIELD team. Skye, Simmons, Fitz, Coulson, May and Ward. Too many people for covert operations, too few for an effective taskforce.

The Agents of SHIELD team. Skye, Simmons, Fitz, Coulson, May and Ward. Not skilled enough for covert operations, too few for an effective task force. And not a doctor among them. (Image sourced from: ScienceFiction.com)

Chloe Bennet plays Skye, a superhacker who hacked SHIELD and tried to expose what they are up to on behalf of anti-establishment internet group Rising Tide, so of course Coulson immediately offers her a job on his covert team. For several episodes there I was expecting Skye to be outed as having psychic computer powers, since there was a lot of talk about how awesome her hacking skills were yet she rarely seemed to be around computers. Instead she’s the kind of superhacker who looks incredible poured into a cocktail dress. Skye’s also has another role in AoS: to make SHIELD look less Big Government. I’ll get to this point in a moment.

Brett Dalton plays Grant Ward, a lone wolf field operative with alleged combat skills to rival Natasha Romanov / Black Widow’s. He’s been fortunate that nearly everyone who has pulled a gun on him has run in really close to do it so he’s been able to disarm them. Other than that – and as serving as mentor to the completely untrained Skye – Ward is bland beefcake. Given that he’s overshadowed by May in the fighting ability stakes – she’s called The Cavalry for a reason – he has less of a purpose on the team than might be the case if he was the most combat capable.

Iain De Caestecker plays Leo Fitz and Elizabeth Henstridge plays Jenna Simmons: the science nerds of the team. They are completely incapable outside of their labs and currently serve the important purposes of being comic relief and making geek references. They also drive the narrative forward by performing SCIENCE on things so they technobabble the way into plot points.

A picture of Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury

Maybe SHIELD has a policy that every agent who dies gets brought back to life and given their own team of attractive people as compensation. This would explain a few things. (Image sourced from: Marvel Movies Wikia)

It’s not entirely clear why SHIELD has created this not-quite-field-ready-and-not-quite-investigation-trained team in the first place. On one hand it flies around the world and deals with on-the-ground issues, yet the team barely functions and you’d probably not trust them to get your pizza order right, let alone deal with superpowered threats. They don’t need to have superpowers themselves, but they can be shown as experts who can function together. This hasn’t happened yet, even if the second episode “0-8-6″ was meant to show the group finally working as a team.

Part of me thinks that TV show “Person of Interest” manages to pull off what AoS tries to do with only two (initial) characters and in a much more limited geographical area. This is because the Person of Interest single field agent is exceptionally capable and his handler / tech person is intelligent and thoughtful. No-one in AoS really appears to be firing on all cylinders – and Coulson isn’t exempted from this criticism, because it is HIS TEAM. He picked this bunch of misfits.

I’ve seen some people tie back what is going on in AoS with Whedon’s “Firefly / Serenity”, because both deal with people on a flying vessel. The big difference is that everyone on the Firefly was great at what they did, even if their personalities clashed at times, and they’d been thrown together by circumstance. The Firefly was pursued by bigger forces and had to stick together in order to survive. On The Bus, the team was handpicked, doesn’t get along and lacks a clear purpose. One day they are in Peru pulling a laser out of an archaeologically significant zone; the next they are pursuing a rogue agent around the world. These tasks require very different skill sets, but it’s always the same team (thus far).

Or to look at Whedon’s “Buffy” and “Angel”, which were also team-based shows: those groups were also (mostly) friends pulled together by circumstance. They were amateurs who learned as they went along. The AoS team are all clearance Level 7 (except for Skye, who didn’t need the years of training or testing or security clearances to earn her place because every covert team needs a crypto-anarchist they literally found on the street, living in their car) yet act like this is their first day on the job.

Action Man

A DVD cover for "Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD" starring David Hasselhoff

This wasn’t that long ago, Disney. These days we expect better. (Image sourced from: Marvel Movies Wikia)

I’m not going to harp on this bit much, but the action in AoS is straight out of a 1990s direct-to-video film. Security experts with guns run up close to their targets so they can be disarmed in melee combat. In “The Asset” Ward does an off-screen teleport and grabs a double-barrelled shotgun, with the sound of an automatic shotgun being readied being foleyed in when he has the gun. “0-8-6″ sees an inflatable life raft used to block a large hole in a flying plane. It’s amateur action hour.

On top of this, the CGI is often a bit wonky. Sure, it’s possibly unfair to compare AoS to the multi-million dollar Marvel films in terms of looks, but then Disney can’t try to leverage the popularity of those films without people looking at the TV output in the same light either. AoS can’t mention the Avengers each episode, but also expect viewers to avoid make direct comparisons between the movie and TV show. If anything, the action in AoS reminded me of the action in the “Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD” TV movie. That’s not a good thing.

And yes, it is appropriate for fewer things to blow up in AoS than in Marvel movies, but that’s what has helped the Marvel films stand out. Not being able to punch big holes in things means that AoS’ scripts have to do more heavy lifting, which is a role they’ve not managed to fill thus far.

A Whole New World

Despite being set in the Marvel film universe, AoS has started by setting up its own sub-world. Instead of the numerous organisations that Marvel has established somewhere in its history, the AoS team is going up against the newcomers of Centipede – who are experimenting in creating superpowered beings – and Rising Tide – a hacker collective who wish to expose the ‘truth’ about government cover-ups around superpower-related events.

A cover from Marvel's Heroes Reborn featuring the Fantasic Four and Iron Man

Many comics try to do things in separate universes that end up being completely ignored in later years. (Image sourced from: Comic Vine)

It reminds me of the start of a new Marvel comic series where the editors don’t want it impacting on anything else: create whole new groups and let them fight it out. If this ‘new comic’ fails, no problem, no damage done to the existing universe. If it works, they may or may not be folded into continuity.

AoS is hamstrung by this. It is of the Marvel film universe, but separate from it. There’s no good reason why Hydra (or any other ‘known’ villain organisation) can’t be used in place of Centipede, other than the Marvel film universe wants to keep Hydra for something special in the films. This is also probably the reason that AoS has been light on for using existing Marvel characters who haven’t yet appeared in the films – if Marvel Studios is trying to establish a form of universe continuity, they don’t want AoS doing something that a film has to later undo.

In five episodes, there have been only two nods towards existing Marvel characters the films haven’t yet established. “The Asset” showed the creation of villain Gravitron and “Girl in the Flower Dress” used and sacrificed a character called Scorch. However, only the Gravitron link was a ‘true’ referenceScorch wasn’t the same character, unless ‘Asian’ and ‘uses fire’ despite having a different name counts (Tommy Ng in the comics, Chan Yo Hin on the TV) as being the same guy.

I suspect it is much easier in the AoS writer’s room to create new characters than to send scripts up the chain for permission to use characters, even if they were as minor as the Kangaroo or Stiltman. (You may laugh at the idea of Stiltman appearing in AoS, but in the team’s current state he’d be a major opponent for them. Hell, Turner D. Century would be a close match-up.)

Who’s The Bad Guy?

I mentioned above that Skye has another, often unrecognised role in AoS: she makes the team look less hostile and authoritarian than it actually is. By having her as an ‘outsider’, the team looks less like a group dedicated to hiding the truth and disappearing superpowered beings, but that’s what they do. Skye gets her moment of “the truth needs to be free!” that no-one listens to but makes the audience feel better about watching Marvel’s version of the CIA / NSA at work.

Here’s something to consider: in every episode of AoS thus far, the standard comic book ‘entities’ have been evil. Here’s a recap:

  • “Pilot”: the ‘superhero’ saves someone later revealed to be working for Centipede and then goes psycho because of the power implant he’s been given.
  • “0-8-4″: the laser recovered is too powerful for anyone to have and needs to be destroyed.
  • “The Asset”:  the ‘mad’ scientist would destroy Malta to prevent his theories doing greater harm, but ends up dead (OR IS HE???… no he isn’t, just everyone thinks he is) by his own creation.
  • “Eye Spy”: the manipulated agent has an x-ray vision implant. In order to bring her back to the ‘good’ guys (who put her in jail, for all the crime she’s committed while manipulated) her eye implant is removed.
  • “Girl in the Flower Dress”: SHIELD has helped keep a man’s life in a rut because he’s got fire powers, only to end up (thanks to Centipede’s intervention) having to kill him or risk him being a danger to society.

TL;DR: superpowers are bad and SHIELD has to keep them down / destroy them before they inevitably corrupt society.

These guys might have something to say about government agencies that try to control people with superpowers. (Image sourced from: Collider.com)

These guys might have something to say about government agencies that try to control people born with superpowers. (Image sourced from: Collider.com)

That’s an odd meta-narrative for a Marvel show, isn’t it? In nearly any other Marvel story, the shadowy government figures that aim to keep those with superpowers under wraps are the bad guys. But AoS wants SHIELD to be the good guys. SHIELD’s role is to run around and try to hide superpowers and superscience – even after the events in New York shown in “The Avengers” – so therefore the things they hide have to be made to look bad.

I look forward to when the AoS team gets its first Sentinel member. For ‘human protection’.

As a non-US viewer of AoS (and the Marvel films) I’m sure I have more of an issue than some people with the AoS team just arriving in a country, doing whatever they want, then waltzing out again, leaving their mess behind with only a, “Trust us, we’re the good guys” as reassurance. SHIELD comes across as an US agency and given current political events about how certain US agencies have treated the rest of the world, it’s hard to buy into the fantasy vision where black suited people show up, bundle people into vans (with their logo on it) and then disappear with an abductee, only to dump them in other countries when they are finished… and be expected to cheer for them.

I’m not comfortable with that. I can’t see SHIELD doing what they do as somehow protecting the world, especially given how inept the team they’ve formed here is.

AoS is the anti-“X-Files”: a show where the lead characters do their damndest to keep things hidden in order to keep their jobs in a secret government conspiracy. The truth is out there in AoS, and every week the team does its best to bury that truth nice and deep for society’s protection.

How times have changed, hey?

With Great Power… Hey, Arrest that Wall-Crawling Man

I’m perplexed about AoS and who signed off on it. It’s a show that should have been heading for the peaks given all the resources behind it, but has instead stalled early after launch.

Skye leaning up against a car with SHIELD logo on the door. Later on this episode it is used in a car chase with a hacker.

Real covert operation you’ve got going on there, SHIELD. (Image sourced from: Hypable.com)

Maybe it will get better. The actors may settle in, the scripts could improve, maybe more money will be released for the actions scenes / CGI. But it’s hard to see how AoS can morph into a show that supports the Marvel universe that is full of superpowered beings who work outside the law (in the films so far, only Captain America appears to have remained within legally permissible boundaries – and he was fighting Nazis on behalf of the US Government, which gives you quite a bit of leeway) unless the team goes rogue. But if the team goes rogue, they won’t work for SHIELD any more and “Agents of Rising Tide” doesn’t have the same name recognition.

There’s still a long way to go to the end of this season, but on the strength of the first quarter of AoS, it’s likely to be the equivalent of a comic book series that is hyped to heaven, struggles to hit its audience targets from shortly after launch and then quietly disappears, mourned by few.

About these ads

16 thoughts on “Marvel Agents of SHIELD: Mediocrity Isn’t A Superpower

  1. Nicely summarized, most of that points help explain why I’m less than enthused about the show so far. Not ready to give up on it yet (sadly, even in its current state it’s probably top 3 of the new shows this year) and it’s early enough that early negative feedback likely hasn’t had a chance to end up in changes but I’m hoping for improvement sooner than later.

    There are two types of weekly procedural-style network shows that seem to succeed and that I generally enjoy enough to watch – the traditional team (NCIS is the poster child, safe TV that gets a ton of viewers) and the “cop with a quirk” derivative (although it’s usually not a cop that has the quirk… The Mentalist, Castle, Bones, Blacklist, PoI, Elementary… probably more). AoS would seem to be the ideal candidate for the latter… have a core team of competent professionals capable of some banter and support roles and have some “quirk” cast, either permanent or transitionary, who come in and do the heavy lifting. Being in a Superhero mythology I’m absolutely baffled that they didn’t do this… they couldn’t just make up some disposable minor superhero (mediheroes?) characters who they could call in to help out in specific scenarios? Maybe bring them back later or tag-team them down the road with other mediheroes to add a bit of conflict/jealousy/etc. Sure, that would be an incredibly easy thing to write (need something done? Just create a medihero who can do only that thing but very well) but there are ways around it… and it’s not like Patrick Jane hasn’t been solving every type of crime imaginable for 6 years despite having a very specialized skillset, it would make MORE sense to bring in guest talent here and there as required.

    Instead, the quirk they introduce is Skye who has basically contributed nothing to the group and was introduced into the series with the deft touch of a jackhammer.

    What they’ve basically done is re-create *NCIS* of all shows… but in a way that doesn’t work for a really important reason that you mention. They have Ward (Tony), Skye/May (Ziva, she covers both, the outsider and the one you don’t want pissed at you), Fitz/Simmons (which is a terrible name… Tim/Abby). They have the core cast covered … well enough.

    Where they screwed up is with Coulson. I like that they put him in charge, it does tie in with the movies and he’s a good boss. Just not the one they made him. I think they want him to be the Gibbs-equivalent but he isn’t, he’s the Vance-equivalent. The boss who should provide general oversight but not day-to-day operational control. They need someone ELSE in that role, someone dymanic who can grab the team by the neck and get them working together. Coulson leaving the team to figure their personal issues out on their own? C’mon. That’s a real world reaction, not a successful TV show one.

    Aiming to be NCIS is an admirable goal if you want 20M viewers and double digit years on the air, sure, but it has to be done right. It’s needs insecurity mixed with confidence, right now we have mostly insecurity. It needs banter between characters comfortable with the banter, right now the banter is forced and uncertain. The weekly cases can be benign but only if the rest of the show can make up for it and stand on its own. Right now that isn’t happening and the cases definitely aren’t enough to sustain the show.

    Personally, I would have made it a show just about mediheroes… guys and gals who have some abilities but they aren’t potent or useful enough to elevate them to franchise movie status but are enough to deal with lesser issues (case of the week stuff). Make the weekly cases mediheroes who could either go good or bad and have that tension be part of the story… having them on your side could be USEFUL down the road but weigh that against the risk if they don’t play ball.

    I might keep Fitz/Simmons as the comic tech duo and possibly May as the bus driver with a past but Ward and Skye go away hard, and fast. Bring in a couple of generalist mediheroes to fill their spots and a team lead who reports to Coulson… hell, May could be that lead, really, with a bit of lightening up and some leadership training. Add a guest medihero every weeks to mix things up and expand the universe a bit and it might end up being a much more watchable show, if still not quite up to the Marvel name.

    • I agree that compared with other procedurals, AoS falls very flat. I mean, “The Blacklist” has been running for about as long and could be just as cheesy, but is a lot more watchable. A lot of this is due to James Spader, who looks like he is having fun playing a villain who knows more than the (often bland) good guys around him. As a show it isn’t aiming for the same audience (and by god, does it love blood / torture) but it’s able to provide a compelling viewing experience in a short time.

      AoS does scream out for some mid-level power characters who aren’t ever going to appear in a film, but it hasn’t done it yet. I can think of a number of comics that have pulled off mid-level (or subtle) powers very well: “Stormwatch: Team Achilles” had unpowered characters who were more tactical than their powered opponents and a series like “Sleeper” had characters with touch-based powers or those related to talking to people. AoS doesn’t need to be a team filled with superpowered beings, but as a Marvel show you’d expect to see that universe used more, and it isn’t.

      We’ll see if it gets better. I haven’t watched “FZZT” yet.

  2. This is an excellent write-up. I haven’t even considered watching the show for a number of reasons. Most of those reasons are validated by your review here.

    I think an anti-hero approach, especially given, as you say, the current US political climate, would’ve worked wonders for conveying SHIELDs place in the Marvel universe, but also in delivering a quality, substantial story to a television audience.

    SHIELD should never be the hero, nor should they ever be the absolute villain.

    • There are certainly better shows to watch than AoS. It would be a lot more interesting if SHIELD was allowed to be more anti-hero, much like (to use another Whedon show) “Serenity / Firefly” allowed its characters to be sometimes.

      Instead the characters seem to roll between being bland or being jerks.

  3. I searched in Google who’s also complaining about SHIELD’s apparent reluctance to use assets from the Marvel Universe and found your well-written blog here. I too had high hopes for Agents of SHIELD, but was also disappointed. I wasn’t expecting a Marvel cinema experience on TV. I am aware about the budget constraints when it comes to CGI (but then again, studio mate Once Upon A Time is pretty decent) so I was expecting stories more grounded involving Marvel’s fringe characters. You know, brushes with defectors from AIM, perhaps breaking up The Word’s cult (a minor Iron Man villain), teaming up with Heroes for H.I.R.E., maybe a quick reference to Deadpool or Weapon X, etc. But like you said, it was disappointing.

    DC’s Arrow is doing a better job (despite its occasional sappiness and aspirations of being Batman), especially this season. They’ve been introducing fan favorites like Deathstroke, Deadshot, Shado, Bronze Tiger, League of Assassins and now it seems Amanda Waller and the Suicide Squad. I guess as you pointed out, AoS is hampered by adhering to the Cinematic Universe while Arrow is on a different reality.

    I do hope AoS becomes better, maybe after crashing their plane so they can reboot the team and the series.

    • “Arrow” is getting a lot more praise than AOS.

      I’m starting to think a big problem with AOS is that no-one is really sure what it meant to be. Spy show? Procedural? Superhero show? Family-friendly action show? Marvel franchise tie-in? Without having that clear goal, it ends up trying to be all things to all people and ends up being nothing to all audiences.

  4. Great post. I’ve been unable thus far to put my finger on just why I’m expected to cheer for a group which is using shadowy government tactics akin to the ‘bad guys’ in The X-Files, but this post helps a lot.

    It being a product of Whedon(s), what it really needs is a Big Bad, and fast.

    • Although a Big Bad would give AoS purpose, I think the wider issue is that the show lacks a point. Why are the agents doing what they do? What motivates them?

      “Buffy” and “Angel” had their teams fight monsters because it was the right thing to do. “AoS” has the team doing a number of tasks because it seems the script says that’s what they should do.

      “Arrow” started out very clearly why the main character was on a particular path; I can’t say the same for “AoS”.

  5. It’s more than likely agent Coulson is one of the new
    L.M.D.s asi said from episode 1Its that obvious to an agent of
    HYDRA like me

  6. Great review. I agree with basically all your points. The main problem that I see at S.H.I.E.L.D’s is they are not using the HUGE amount of assets that Marvel has at its disposal outside of the Mutant Universe (Fox has the rights) and Spiderverse (Sony has the rights).

    It quite sad. I would love to see more superpower. Even in the comics SHIELD is not a “human only” entitity, since the beginning. In the first issues of Nick Fury’s Shield in the sixties they used some telepats (the ESP Division) to power up a Mental Amplifier to fight Mentallo. In that time they didn’t classify these powers as “mutants”.

    And they should truly kill some characters. If they truly had killed Jemma Simmons in the virus episode I would really be afraid for the characters live, it would be thriling. Learn from the murderous George Martin in Game of Thrones, killing some of the main characters make you hate the writer but truly addicted to the story. Every time I watch a SHIELD episode that involves a risk for the characters life I just know it will be okay in the end. No more adrenaline, unfortunately.

    Some of the changes I would make in this Show would be.

    – Hawkeye as the lead character
    Even though the actor Jeremy Lee Renner could be very expensive, I would definitely include him in the show as the lead character.
    It is a great character that did not have that much depth in the movies. Even Jeremy showed signs that he wanted to explore more.
    I would go with him as the leader of the team and certainly this would attract a crowd, besides opening the chance for Marvel to fight in equal terms against Arrow.

    – Go more Black Ops and espionage
    The main point of the show is that “attack on New York” changed everything. So the way they used to deal with things before has to change.
    Fury always stated they need a “response team”. So why not transform this band of misfits in some kink of SHIELD’s Howling Commandoes and get more offensive?

    – Skye as Jessica Jones
    Since we don’t know her true name yet? I would take the chance for that pretty actress and transform her in Jessica Jones. Just involve her in some freakish accident and give her extra natural powers.

    – Heroes for Hire
    Why not hire some of the heroes for Hire. For instance, Luke Cage. After all, is doesn’t seem like SHIELD does not have the resources to hire some of them.

    – More Global Intrigue
    The whole world changed. Corporate and crime cartel interests all around the world should reach for power in a super power age. They should bring more of these elements…

    • A lot of people expected there to be recognisable Marvel properties in the show, not very occasional easter eggs or blink and you’ll miss it references.

      I’m currently watching Haven series 3 and it is a better Marvel show than AoS is, at least in how it handles people with powers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s